Facebook Pixel

AAA Food Handler

NEVADA
FOOD HANDLERS CARD

4.9
(26,839 reviews)

4.9
(26,839 reviews)

Our clients

BENEFITS OF TRAINING

plates

PREVENT

Education is the best tool to prevent, minimize, or eliminate foodborne illnesses and food hazards.

apples

AWARENESS

Improve critical thinking and decision making to prevent or avoid sticky situations.
Food Hygiene Training

ELIMINATE

Training helps reduce or eliminate food safety hazards before they become major issues.

trophies

MINIMIZE

Be able to recognize, mitigate, reduce or eliminate the risk of improper food safety procedures.
dinner

PRODUCTIVITY

Reducing food safety complaints will create a happier workplace and in turn increase productivity.

waiter

WORKPLACE SATISFACTION

Serving safe food will increase productivity will in turn increase workplace satisfaction.

WHY CHOOSE US 

Food handler card

Getting Your Food Handler Card is Quick and Hassle-Free

Numerous professionals nationwide have already earned and renewed their card with AAA Food Handler — a trusted name in food safety training.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs)

In Clark County, including Las Vegas, individuals must take an in-person test administered by the Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD) to obtain a Food Handler Safety Card. While cards accredited by the ANAB are generally accepted

The course costs just $6.95. Businesses can also access bulk discounts to train multiple employees at once.

The course takes about 1.5 hours to complete and is entirely self-paced. You can start and stop anytime, based on your availability.

The course teaches key food safety practices, such as:

  • How to prevent foodborne illnesses
  • Safe methods for storing and handling food
  • Effective hygiene and proper handwashing techniques
  • Cleaning and sanitizing tools and surfaces
  • Maintaining correct time and temperature controls to keep food safe

You’ll have two chances to complete the 40-question final exam, and a score of at least 70% is required to pass.

The course is in English and Spanish, ensuring accessibility for diverse employees.

This course helps maintain a safe, sanitary food environment and improves customer trust. For you, it boosts job readiness and fulfills workplace course requirements.

You’ll have a second chance to retake the exam after reviewing the course material, at no additional cost.

The Nevada Food Handlers Card course is State approved and meets all state food safety standards. For local requirements, check with your health department or employer.

Online access allows you to train anytime, anywhere—no commuting or scheduling conflicts. It’s affordable and fits easily into your routine.

It teaches best practices in hygiene, cleaning, food handling, and temperature control—all proven to reduce the risk of foodborne outbreaks.

With a Food Handler Certificate, you can work in a variety of food service settings, including:

  • Restaurants (counter-service, fast food, fine dining)
  • Cafés, bakeries, and coffee shops
  • Grocery stores and convenience stores
  • Food trucks and catering services
  • Hotels and large event venues

In Clark County, you must take an in-person test with the SNHD to receive an official food handler card. In other counties, you can complete an ANAB accredited course online or in person to meet employer or local health requirements.

Clark County (Las Vegas and surrounding areas):
Southern Nevada Health District
280 S. Decatur Blvd., Las Vegas, NV 89107

All Other Counties:
Nevada Department of Health and Human Services
Division of Public and Behavioral Health
4150 Technology Way, Carson City, NV 89706

Baked goods, jams, jellies, granola, dry mixes, honey, herbs, candies, dried fruits, and other shelf-stable products.

No, a Food Handler certificate is not required under Nevada’s Cottage Food Law, but it is highly recommended to ensure safe food handling and improve consumer confidence.

Food Handler Reviews

4.9

Food Protection Training
26,839 reviews
4.9
4.9 out of 5 stars (based on 26,839 reviews)
Excellent92%
Very good6%
Average2%
Poor0%
Terrible0%

Quick and easy to understand

November 9, 2023

Joel G.

5

November 9, 2023

Jose O.

Good Course

November 9, 2023

Good Course

LeRoy W.

Good

November 9, 2023

Perfect

Yishak G.

3

November 9, 2023

Decent

Pratham P.

good

November 9, 2023

Kassandra U.

Bueno

November 9, 2023

Ariana V.

Very informative, well explained, and easy to understand,

November 9, 2023

Veronica Q.

Very good, would recommend to others!

November 8, 2023

I love food

Ian M.

Good

November 8, 2023

Ying L.

Five stars

November 8, 2023

Easy

Karina A.

excellent training and exam questions

November 8, 2023

excellent

JohnLong L.

great training

November 8, 2023

Reben B.

Pretty good

November 8, 2023

Jackson W.

alot of good info!

November 8, 2023

David M.

i learned something new thank you

November 8, 2023

good

Jesus C.

pretty good and cheapest option I saw

November 8, 2023

bit of a hefty final exam, but if you paid attention you should do good.

Juan B.

Hmm

November 8, 2023

Suzanne S.

Thanks for the capacitación

November 8, 2023

Jesus D.

Course content seemed fine, but there are a few places (technical & content) which could be improved upon

November 8, 2023

Most of what follows is things I feel could be improved upon, but which largely don’t negatively impact the overall effectiveness of the course.

Technical issues:

– Variable audio between video segments, usually within a similar level, but occasionally drastically quieter

– Not all videos had closed captions, which is a vital tool for folks who may be hard of hearing, or who process information better when read over heard

– Volume and closed captions settings did not carry over between videos, this is minor, but it is frustrating to turn it up and enable CC on every single video segment

– I did also notice on a couple of the videos the controls for pausing/playing, volume, and closed captions moved to different places.

– The videos did a have a delay for me, but not too significant, however I feel this could be streamlined a bit better. I’m assuming the delay is due to a back end process first checking if you’ve completed the prior module and then initiating the process to load the video. Something which could be done to help improve the loading speed is having the video quality reduced to about 720p(assuming they’re not already), since most of the modules videos contained still images or infographics which wouldn’t be drastically negatively impacted by a lower resolution and they’re all pretty short and less than 5min which should mean the video files are small in size and they load swiftly.

Content:

– One of the first questions about High Risk Populations for foodborne illness was badly worded, the question “Which of the following groups are at a high risk of getting foodborne illness? click on each one to learn more” -> this implied that only the groups at higher risks should be selected, but the module actually wanted you to click on each group to learn more about them and their individual risks of foodborne illness.

– The Handwashing segment and steps I felt would have been better if it instead cut to segments of a video playing which demonstrate visually what was needed for each step rather than watching a video first then looking at simple infographic images. Or perhaps talked the steps in the handwashing process over the handwashing video shown initially.

– The segment on personal hygiene’s cartoon example, I felt dipped into over exaggeration and was poorly worded. The directions afterword’s felt ok, but during the video the comments “looks at your uncombed hair” and “she pinches her nose because you obviously didn’t shower” aren’t great. Instead if you have to keep the comments about hair and not showering, I’d recommend changing the wording to something closer to “concerningly unexpected and/or unpleasant odors” or “concerningly unkempt appearances”. Reasoning is, otherwise this really only applies to the beginning of a shift and to those not working in hot or fast paced areas of the food service/restaurant. Honestly though I’d just remove the cartoon animation from that segment, I can see the intent of a “this is why these things are needed” example, but if its removed it would reduce the overall time of the course and its removal doesn’t hamper the information which is needed to get across.

– Generally I felt things could have been a bit more succinct, there were a number of places where information was reiterated without significant changes or additional surrounding information. I realize some of that could have been for the sake of emphasizing, but if reduced, the modules time could probably be reduced by about 10-15minutes at a rough guesstimation.

– Something minor is the temperature ranges change a bit based on altitude(atmospheric pressure), temperature, and humidity making the boiling point of water vary depending on these factors and isn’t always exactly 212°F.

Sean M.